CO2 emissions from an EA-18G Growler

CO2 emissions from an EA-18G Growlerimage

Ever wondered how much carbon dioxide is produced by one of those EA-18G Growlers Navy jets that have been roaring over Lopez? A friend asked me this question a couple days ago and I did the math. The results are shocking! (If you’re interested in the details, I put the calculations and links to all sources here:

The average jet fuel consumption rate (based on typical operations patterns) of the EA-18G Growler is 1,304 gallons per hour. Combustion of jet fuel produces 9.57 kg CO2 per gallon. The CO2 produced is thus 9.57 kg * 1304 gal/hour = 12479 kg/hour or about 12.5 metric tons of CO2 per hour.

The per capita emissions in Washington state in 2011 was 10.18 metric tons per year (including all residential, commercial and industrial activities), so one hour of flight is about 23% more than the annual CO2 emissions of a typical Washington state citizen.

Another way of looking at it is to compare to CO2 emissions from a car. The typical passenger car found on US roads today (averaging old and new, inefficient and efficient) emits 0.423 kg CO2 per mile. Thus, one hour of a single EA-18G Growler flight is equivalent to driving a typical car 29,500 miles. That’s five round trip road trips from Anacortes to New York City with a bit left over for sightseeing. It’s also about an eighth of the distance between the earth and the moon. (In a Prius, you could do almost 13 round trips from Anacortes to New York City or a third of the distance to the moon).

Or, we could compare one of these airplanes flying overhead to the number of cars driving simultaneously that would produce CO2 at the same rate as a single Growler flying overhead. Let’s imagine a fleet of average US passenger cars all driving the Lopez maximum speed of 45 mph. A car going 45 mph makes 19.0 kg per hour of CO2 (45 mph* 0.423 kg CO2/mile). A single EA-18G Growler flying overhead makes as much CO2 as 656 average US cars driving at maximum speed on Lopez (12479/19.0).

I’m upset about the increased noise of these jets, as are most folks I talk to. It turns out if you care about climate change, perhaps one of the most effective things you can do is encourage the Navy to get their soldiers out of the cockpit and into flight simulators (or better, encourage a demilitarized foreign policy). Please consider writing letters or calling Senators Murray, Cantwell, and Representative Rick Larsen.

Written by: Chris Greacen, PhD


  1. Harrison Davignon

    Wow that is shocking. We need to reduce pollution and fuel consumption, not increase it. Not only is noise pollution hurting people and and wild life, now air pollution is doing the same thing. We should reduce noise and use military bio fuels to make this planet a better place. Also the military should have some rules and restrictions as far as were they can set up operation and noise restrictions and not just be able to do what they want. I appreciate the military and all they do and all they have done, thank you, but at least respect people and wildlife and wilderness areas.

  2. Sue Hamilton

    Have you looked at Growler CO levels versus an automobile?

  3. Neal Liden

    Living on Discovery Bay for 60 years and now hearing growlers evening and morning. Doesn’t hurt my ears but concerns me in other ways. This country’s military foreign policy and enormous annual expenditure on our military must be must be seen as an immoral and unreasonable drain on the economy. Social and economic programs in the US suffer because of our obsession with weapons of war. Two hours of one growler operation emits as much CO2 as my household does in one year.

  4. Eric meng

    Thanks for doing the calculations. What is startling is to multiply that one hour by the time and number of flights day after day. And our representatives all brag about their environmental stewardship…..

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts